How to Take Notes on your Research
I wish I had a really great system that I loved . . . but not so much
I’ve been thinking about this topic for a while because taking notes for the books I’m writing has become the bane of my existence. No joke.
Way back in the day when I was in grad school, it was standard to use index cards to do research, taking notes on a single card for each topic. When I felt good about my dissertation research, for example, I had hundreds (thousands?) of individual notecards and there’s something appealing about that. I could shuffle them around physically, moving them into topics (chapters) and then arrange them in a logical way to prove my argument. It was tangible and, again, physical and I think my brain liked that. I could “see” my argument laid out on the floor, a large table, or even taped to a wall.
But now? In recent years, I’ve moved to taking notes digitally, but I’ve yet to find a system I’m really satisfied with. For years I used Roam Research, a pricey tool that links notes, and I thought I’d love it. I don’t—even though I have all the research I’ve done so far on a book lodged into it at the moment.
I’ve also been trying Obsidian (free) in the last month, using it to store all my research for a journal article I’ll be submitting later this month. It’s similar to Roam but also not. And I’m also not a huge fan.
I’ve even tried taking notes in Zotero, which is where I store my project’s bibliographies. That was totally unworkable because that’s not what Zotero is meant to do.
I think my brain is still in that “note card/index card” stage but also, I think brains do cement information better when things are written out longhand, which helps to explain why I’ve taken tons of notes digitally and yet, I can’t seem to remember any of that information. (Here’s the science that proves this.) This is a problem because how can I put those connections together when I can’t remember the information? In theory, Roam and Obsidian can both make those connections for me but it doesn’t seem to work for me the way I want it to—maybe I’m not linking things correctly when I’m taking the notes originally? I am used to just taking notes and then making those “links” later by shuffling cards around.
So what’s next for me? Go back to index cards? Persevere with the digital note-taking? Keep searching for a “better” note taking tool? Like trying Notion?
I’m not sure yet. If you have a system you love, I’d like to hear more about it.
I can empathize. Graduated undergrad in 1993 and was a 3x5 card type as well. Now, thirty years later, working on a doctorate and I've got Zotero and Obsidian and my last seminar paper I used....3 x 5 cards. It worked.
I highlighted in Zotero (and in a few books) then went back through the highlights and hand-wrote index cards for the ideas that still seemed relevant. I shuffled and sorted and wrote just like it was 1992 and it worked. (Having the Zotero plugin to do citations in Word is pretty magical.)
Then, when it was all over, I put a copy of the finished paper in my Obsidian....